Keep Oppo Stock

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 02/17/2016 at 15:35 • Filed to: None

9

13

No mods, ye hear?

Your boy, BJR > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/17/2016 at 15:44

3

NO.

Wacko > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/17/2016 at 15:44

3

can we make oppo, kinja free?

JustAnotherG6 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/17/2016 at 15:45

0

Nice Bonnie! One of my HS buddy’s dad had a 4 door ‘68.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Your boy, BJR 02/17/2016 at 15:47

5

YOU ALL SEE THIS?!?! THIS IS WHAT WE MUST DEFEND OUR BELOVED BLOG AGAINST!!!!

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > JustAnotherG6 02/17/2016 at 15:48

1

They’re fantastic lookers. Plus it’s a bit different from the same old Impala convertible.

RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht > Your boy, BJR 02/17/2016 at 15:51

1

Bounceville.

JustAnotherG6 > Your boy, BJR 02/17/2016 at 15:52

1

This is going to hurt your chances for MOD.

Mercedes Streeter > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/17/2016 at 15:56

2

for Michigan > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/17/2016 at 16:09

1

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Mercedes Streeter 02/17/2016 at 16:45

1

“stock”

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > JustAnotherG6 02/17/2016 at 16:49

0

I feel like there may be bigger issues.

JustAnotherG6 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/17/2016 at 16:50

1

At least it isn’t on DUBs...

That's gonna leave a mark! > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 02/17/2016 at 17:05

0

I believe in both the 65 and 66 years Pontiac offered a version of this model (2 door) called just the 2+2 . The 2+2 badges replaced the Bonneville badges. The 2+2 was a 321 with 3 - 2 barrel carbs and a 4 speed Hurst shifter on the floor. Also a car worth preserving and preserving in the non modified state.